From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:11:30 +0100 Message-ID: <877fvg76i5.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87bnkvm8la.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj8co3se.fsf@berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50253) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNmcq-0000re-3R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:12:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNmcm-0002Jn-U9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:12:00 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNmcm-0002Jg-OO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:11:56 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YNmcb-0005A3-2n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:11:45 +0100 Received: from tsn77-247-182-246.dyn.nltelcom.net ([77.247.182.246]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:11:45 +0100 Received: from rasmus by tsn77-247-182-246.dyn.nltelcom.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 19:11:45 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Richard Lawrence writes: > Basically, I think you could ignore the distinctions that the [cite: > ...] syntax is capable of expressing, and just write all your citations > like: > > [cite: See @Doe99 for more on this point.] %%(:type footnoted) > > or, in the syntax Nicolas proposed, something like: > > [cite: See @Doe99 for more on this point.]{:type footnoted} > > You would then use an export filter to transform citations with this > :type into the appropriate command, something along the lines of: This seems backward and wrong /to me/. Why not global options? I actually think we "agreed" on this earlier. #+cite: text-cite #+(cite): parenthesis-cite Or #+cite: numeric #+(cite): footnote-cite This is why I asked Tom earlier if he normally uses more than two citation TYPES. Presumably citeauthor and citeyear works irrespective of the main citation type. So I still think that having two TYPES handy will meet most requirements. —Rasmus -- m-mm-mmm-mmmm bacon!