From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Colin Baxter Subject: Re: Heads-up: test failures Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 05:53:08 +0000 Message-ID: <877f4satkr.fsf@yandex.com> References: <87d1emexl3.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <84tw7xj32y.fsf@tm6592> <87d1elltjb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8760kdg5id.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <878tp9yz20.fsf@yandex.com> <87r330elih.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <8737fgqx7b.fsf@yandex.com> <871sv0e7e2.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38296) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdsWm-0004hV-Nr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:53:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdsWj-00078H-LN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:53:20 -0500 Received: from forward1h.cmail.yandex.net ([87.250.230.16]:33162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdsWj-00077z-4i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:53:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871sv0e7e2.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> (Nick Dokos's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:26:29 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nick Dokos Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nick On Tue, Feb 14 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: > Colin Baxter writes: > >> On Tue, Feb 14 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: >> >>> Colin Baxter writes: >>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 13 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >>>>> >>>>>> What is the failure in each case? >>>>> >>>> ---- snip ---- >>>> >>>> Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 07:58:32+0000) >>>> 8 expected failures >>>> >>>> org-mode release_9.0.5-282-g2e32709 >>>> emacs-25.1.1; 3.2.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.2.84-1 i686 GNU/Linux >>>> >>>> >>> >>> It might be that emacs 26 shows the failures (both Marco Wahl and I are >>> running that, but Colin Baxter runs emacs 25 and does not see them). >> >> >> Unfortunately, the tests pass using emacs-26 too: >> >> Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 21:21:38+0000) >> 8 expected failures >> >> org-version: 9.0.5 (release_9.0.5-288-g4caad0) >> GNU Emacs 26.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2017-02-11 >> >> > > Well, I'm running 26.0.50.2, so there is still a possible out. But Marco Wahl > is running 26.0.50.1, so there goes that theory :-) > > I usually run a shell within emacs and I ran `make test' from there earlier. > I tried doing a `make test' from a shell in an `emacs -q' and also just from > a plain xterm: I still get the four failures. Sorry, my mistake. Because of my setup I was not using emacs-26 to make the test but inadvertently emacs-25. Using emacs-26, I can now confirm: Ran 711 tests, 707 results as expected, 4 unexpected (2017-02-15 05:39:31+0000) 8 expected failures 4 unexpected results: FAILED test-org-list/move-item-down FAILED test-org-list/move-item-up FAILED test-org/custom-properties FAILED test-org/forward-paragraph Sorry about that. Best wishes, Colin.