From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Two ob-lua versions
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 10:22:17 +0100
Message-ID: <877erjdgom.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87eflsduo9.fsf@dell-desktop.WORKGROUP>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41968)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eknq2-00086E-Mk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:22:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1eknq2-0007tA-0D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:22:22 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:43027)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1eknq1-0007rx-R6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 04:22:21 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87eflsduo9.fsf@dell-desktop.WORKGROUP> (Thibault Marin's message
	of "Sat, 10 Feb 2018 22:20:06 -0600")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Thibault Marin <thibault.marin@gmx.com>
Cc: emacs-org list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Thibault Marin <thibault.marin@gmx.com> writes:

> I noticed that a recent change added an ob-lua.el file to contrib/lisp/.
> Since there is already an ob-lua.el in lisp/, I was wondering if the new
> version was adding functionality not supported by the one in lisp/ (it
> does not seem to be the case on casual inspection) and if so, whether
> they could/should be merged.

I just realized that, too. It seems wrong. I'm Cc'ing stardiviner so we
can have some insight about it.

stardiviner, would you mind explaining why you need to create an
"ob-lua.el" library in "contrib/" ?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou