From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Integration of Org mode and Gnus Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:39:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87644hafg5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87r6n6ni2j.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fy3lapkt.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IBBdB-0008Oq-8x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:40:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IBBd9-0008OT-NR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:40:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IBBd9-0008OQ-Kc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:39:59 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IBBd9-0002p4-7c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:39:59 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 34so324547ugf for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:39:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Georg C. F. Greve's message of "Wed\, 18 Jul 2007 15\:08\:47 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Georg C. F. Greve" writes: > I see this in *Messages*: > > Retrieving newsgroup: nnml:gnu.ml.emacs.orgmode... > Fetching headers for nnml:gnu.ml.emacs.orgmode...done > Suppressing duplicates...done > Scoring...done > Generating summary...done > No more unread articles > Couldn't fetch article <20070718095834.109112202E9@quill.bollow.ch> > > So it seems to look into the wrong group. I found out that the registry is not up-to-date until you save the ~/gnus.registry.el. Replace `gnus-registry-initialize' by `gnus-registry-save' in the patch before. It should be okay - unless there are special issues with virtual groups. > Considering that gnus-registry-alist can slow down Gnus considerably > and I normally don't use it, I'd ask to always ensure it does not > depend on it. Please. :) I still think using gnus-registry might be a good solution, even if it requires making access to `gnus-registry-alist' more efficient. Best, -- Bastien