From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: Collecting unique selling proposition (USP) of Org-mode Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:14:10 +0200 Message-ID: <8761iopmwt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <2014-07-01T21-05-55@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9qku-0006M1-Fg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 03:14:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9qkp-00013v-Sp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 03:14:28 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X9qkp-00013p-Mu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 03:14:23 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X9qkn-00089n-8o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:14:21 +0200 Received: from e178188214.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.188.214]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:14:21 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by e178188214.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:14:21 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org M writes: >> Von: Karl Voit >> Organisation: www.karl-voit.at >> Antworten an: Karl Voit >> Datum: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 21:07:32 +0200 >> An: >> Betreff: Re: [O] Collecting unique selling proposition (USP) of Org-mode >> >>> I think the best thing to compare different tools is making a list with >>> features and mark which tools support which ones. >>> I assume there is already such a list >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_personal_information_managers > > OK, the list is there, but it is not comparing features directly. > > A very good example is the features comparison of docear with some of its > alternatives: > http://www.docear.org/2014/01/15/comprehensive-comparison-of-reference-manag > ers-mendeley-vs-zotero-vs-docear/ #+begin_quote A while ago, Mendeley was acquired by Elsevier for an estimated 69-100 Million Dollars. #+end_quote wow If Org-mode is better than Mendeley (which I don't know at all), then its worth a fortune ;) -- cheers, Thorsten