From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: Other editors supporting Org-Mode Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:53:15 +0200 Message-ID: <8761fu9w44.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87oatmbrj5.fsf@student.uibk.ac.at> <87a9565rml.fsf@yale.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbxIj-0000Ym-SK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:53:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbxIe-0004TP-IO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:53:33 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41219) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbxIe-0004TF-Bh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:53:28 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XbxIc-0005sG-31 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:53:26 +0200 Received: from e178191197.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.191.197]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:53:26 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by e178191197.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:53:26 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org jorge.alfaro-murillo@yale.edu (Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo) writes: > hymie! writes: > >> I would suggest, rather than adapting more editors to support >> Org, creating a stand-alone program that "compiles" and manages >> Org functions separate from the act of editing them. > > Perhaps the easiest thing would be an emacs configuration that > makes emacs just an org editor for Word users: My intended use-case is editing Org syntax in HTML text-areas, and it would be a marvellous solution to give the users a pre-configured specialized Emacs(server) and help them to configure their web-brower(s) to call emacs(client) as an external editor when editing text-areas in web formulas. Marvellous, but unfortunately a bit optimistic IMO and too dangerous. When going this route, it should rather be Zile or Nano or another preinstalled minimal editor (what would it be on Windows? what on Apple) without Emac's (destructive) power. Did anybody on the list tried to extend Zile/Nano/? or their MS Windows or Apple equivalent, and can share experiences? Or what about extending TinyMCE (http://www.tinymce.com/) for some Org syntax support? I don't know how hard this would be, if at all possible, but from the user-perspective this might be the easiest solution. -- cheers, Thorsten