From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [bug, org-table] new hline doesn't update formula
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 09:34:55 +0200
Message-ID: <87617q72zk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87zj55wxri.fsf@gmx.us> <87y4kn6nd2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87h9rbxbuw.fsf@gmx.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47603)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YuFYL-0001fl-5i
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 03:33:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YuFYK-0002I6-4w
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 03:33:33 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:44881)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1YuFYJ-0002Hw-UT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 03:33:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87h9rbxbuw.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sun, 17 May
	2015 21:06:31 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

>>> Consider this example:
>>>
>>> |---+---+---|
>>> | a | b | c |
>>> | d | e | f |
>>> |---+---+---|
>>> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
>>> | 4 | 5 | 6 |
>>> |---+---+---|
>>> | 5 | 7 | 9 |
>>> #+TBLFM: @5=vsum(@II..@III)

[...]

>> What should happen to the formula if hline is inserted between |1|2|3|
>> and |4|5|6|?
>
> Good question.  I'm not sure.  While not necessarily the most obvious I
> think in that case the formula should be unchanged.  But it's not
> obvious.

Another tricky example

  |  1 |
  |----|
  |  2 |
  |  3 |
  |  4 |
  |----|
  |  5 |
  |----|
  | 14 |
  #+TBLFM: @6=vsum(@I..@III)

What if we insert a hline between |3| and |4|? 

I assume it should become "@I..@IIII". Yet, the difference between it
and the case before is subtle, and hard to explain.

That leads me to the next question: should we really mess with this?


Regards,