From: Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Possible bug getting bounds of URL at point?
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 15:34:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xt59iuq.fsf@red-bean.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875xt5cclk.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Tue, 16 Jul 2024 20:21:11 +0000")
On 16 Jul 2024, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
>> Assume we have this line in an Org Mode buffer (note there are
>> three trailing spaces after the final "m" -- hopefully the MTAs
>> and MUAs will leave those spaces there):
>>
>> https://example.com
>>
>> Let's say the initial "h" is at position 22205, the position
>> right
>> after the final "m" is 22224, and the final position on the
>> line
>> (after the three spaces) is 22227.
>>
>> With point anywhere inside the URL, if I run
>> (bounds-of-thing-at-point 'url), I currently get this result:
>>
>> (22205 . 22227)
>>
>> But I expected this result instead:
>>
>> (22205 . 22224)
>>
>> Is (22205 . 22227) correct, and I'm just misunderstanding how
>> URL
>> boundaries are supposed to work in Org Mode?
>
>This is correct. Trailing whitespace belongs to the preceding
>node in
>Org syntax. This is not a bug.
>
>Moreover, if you have something like
>[[https//orgmode.org][description]]
>the whole thing will be considered a URL.
Thank you, Ihor.
I admit that I don't immediately understand why this is a good
thing. The user asked for the bounds of the URL at point, but got
instead the bounds of some other thing (the Org "node").
Especially in the case of a standalone URL, with no description
text, I don't see how including the whitespace is useful.
However, there could be issues here that I'm not familiar with.
It sounds like you've already thought this out and concluded that
that including the trailing whitespace is the right behavior. If
you have time to explain why in more detail, I'd appreciate a
chance to learn more about it. However, if you don't have time to
do that, it's no problem.
I can change the code I'm writing to do things a different way, so
this behavior need not interfere with my current task, in any
case.
Best regards,
-Karl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-16 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-16 20:10 Possible bug getting bounds of URL at point? Karl Fogel
2024-07-16 20:21 ` Ihor Radchenko
2024-07-16 20:34 ` Karl Fogel [this message]
2024-07-17 14:37 ` Ihor Radchenko
2024-07-17 17:05 ` Karl Fogel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875xt59iuq.fsf@red-bean.com \
--to=kfogel@red-bean.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=yantar92@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).