From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Pluim Subject: Re: org-end-of-line and in table interaction Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 14:29:38 +0200 Message-ID: <874le8jxl9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wor6j7gi.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvm9vrqy.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sh1tkf02.fsf@gmail.com> <87lg7lvmlo.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87o9chkctf.fsf@gmail.com> <8736ttfxfk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39425) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6ENY-0002Da-AP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 08:29:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6ENU-00067w-EN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 08:29:48 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]:36451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6ENS-00066n-A5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 08:29:44 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id n23-v6so4541008wmc.1 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 05:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rpluim-ubuntu (vav06-1-78-207-202-134.fbx.proxad.net. [78.207.202.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u13-v6sm6047250wrq.16.2018.09.29.05.29.39 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 29 Sep 2018 05:29:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8736ttfxfk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 28 Sep 2018 17:34:23 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Robert Pluim writes: > >> It does call 'end-of-line'. If that=CA=BCs the intended semantics, it=CA= =BCs not >> entirely clear from the docstring (and I will adjust my code). > > The first sentence is: > > Go to the end of line, but before ellipsis, if any. > > If you think that's ambiguous, would you want to suggest a different > wording? Or do you think we should add a more explicit reference to > `end-of-line' function somewhere in the docstring?=20 I thought it was for headlines only because the next paragraph talks about headlines, but that was entirely my misreading. Robert