From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qIcFDKkk1V7UGAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:54:17 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id oEvGB6kk1V6BYQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 15:54:17 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B6029404CB for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 15:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56810 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfmlQ-0002Mw-Jr for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 11:54:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfmkj-0002MM-Lv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 11:53:29 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51376) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfmki-0005UU-6o; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 11:53:28 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e35:2fe1:f780:a886:3d11:7807:868b] (port=39006 helo=guerry) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jfmkg-0000bK-8N; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 11:53:27 -0400 Received: by guerry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 24AAB1A603C1; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:53:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien To: Mario Frasca Subject: Re: issue tracker? Organization: GNU References: <87ftbw3mvw.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <6ffc8465-fdeb-4981-8303-43f09e26e0c1@www.fastmail.com> <20200519073352.GC7874@tuxteam.de> <08ee796b-d541-69f3-518e-f577d9b29f0b@anche.no> <87imgau9ny.fsf@gnu.org> <71f5fa9a-8f55-6869-151a-209f53f86579@anche.no> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 17:53:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <71f5fa9a-8f55-6869-151a-209f53f86579@anche.no> (Mario Frasca's message of "Mon, 1 Jun 2020 10:46:41 -0500") Message-ID: <874kruzssr.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: SWHm55f4CJ4B Hi Mario, Mario Frasca writes: > while working on my contribution, I'm also reading the code I'm adding > to, and I am tempted to perform unrelated edits, like correcting a > docstring to a function that does something, just not quite what the > docstring says, or refactoring stuff in order to add missing unit > tests, but that way my patch would not focus on the task of adding > this small piece of functionality. > > it's several unrelated edits, and if we were to do this via email, it > would cost all of us so much time, that I think I'll better leave it. It cost time only if we have to discuss your changes. If you are confident you can get commit access and apply your changes without discussing them first, then let's just go ahead with giving you write access. But in general we do require that people get familiar with the way we expect contributions before giving write access. Let us know what would help you contribute more. Best, -- Bastien