From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:23:27 +0200 Message-ID: <8739ivw8e8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2011-06-24T16-30-43@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <8772.1308931315@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <2011-06-26T13-23-38@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbEaS-0004PQ-O9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:23:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbEaQ-0007gv-W5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:23:00 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:59078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbEaQ-0007gq-Nu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:22:58 -0400 Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so3910120wwf.30 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:22:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2011-06-26T13-23-38@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> (Karl Voit's message of "Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:30:35 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: news1142@Karl-Voit.at Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Karl Voit writes: > Same to me. Unfortunately I am using timestamps not only in the > context of DEADLINE or SCHEDULED but also for events that should > simply show up on the agenda (without deadline or scheduled > timestamp at all). > > To me this *is* a bug since my expected behavior of org-time-stamp > to modify an existing timestamp is different. Yes, this is a bug. > So, how reaches this bug report a person who is able to fix it? You've just done so :) It is now fixed in the latest git version. Please test and report, if possible. > PS: Sorry, I still don't know ELISP yet and therefore can't fix it > by myself. No problem! -- Bastien