From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [OT] Does anyone use Tinderbox? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 08:18:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87392fbpae.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ipbty202.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87pq5p3xqf.fsf@altern.org> <87haqwrqs1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54401) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDv0U-0005AW-MX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 06:26:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDv0K-0002vw-91 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 06:26:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:61810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TDv0J-0002v1-Lb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 06:26:08 -0400 Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so5198831wib.0 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 03:26:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87haqwrqs1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:47:10 +0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Eric, Eric Abrahamsen writes: > * [ag] Next Tasks > :PROPERTIES: > :AGENDA_QUERY: -WAITING-CANCELLED/!NEXT > :END: > > The [ag] cookie tells Org that this is an agenda headline. You hit "C-c > C-g" (or something) within this headline, and Org runs the query and > inserts the results as children of the headline. It's just a plain old > Org headline, and can be saved or exported as part of the file. The only > difference is that you can continue to update it (either manually or > with a hook), and that certain Org agenda keybindings are in effect > while point is in the headline (actually this part would probably be the > most difficult). IMHO this would mix the functionalities you have in an .org file and those you have in an agenda too much. Another problem is that you will end up with duplicated headlines. But if I get the gist of the idea correctly, it sounds like something I've been thinking about: a way to collect headlines from an agenda view, then capture or refile them under a new headline. Not exactly what you are thinking about, but based on the core idea of collecting more easily. -- Bastien