From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: New exporter Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:37:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87391k4x7e.fsf@gmail.com> References: <80391lnq65.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMOdL-0002mF-Rp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:41:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMOdC-0000M6-K0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:41:27 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TMOdC-0000Lx-CN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:41:18 -0400 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TMOdA-00040B-E0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:41:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <80391lnq65.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:34:10 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org Hello, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > I've been hit by trying to export with `C-c E p' [1] to PDF, but had troubles > doing so. In fact, I had to do `C-c l p' -- though the new dispatcher is much > more clear and _easy_ to use, I thought there was a problem. > > Why? Because there was no beep to say that `p' entered at that moment was a > wrong choice, nor other form of message. I think that'd help, if there was > such a sound produced, for example. Right now, the bad keys are simply ignored > without further notice. > > Second thing that puzzled me: the focus (active modeline) is on the window > with the Org source, not on the window with the dispatcher. It was the same > with the old exporter, but I wonder whether it must be like that, or whether > that could be changed, to emphasize that the key events are well going to the > dispatcher window? > > At first, I thought that my first problem (`p' not doing anything was due to > that -- dispatcher window not active). I wanted to switch over to it (via > `F6' [2]) and ended with garbage in the echo area... C-c E p f6 p p f6... > > Does this make sense? It does. I've implemented suggested changes in master. Thanks for suggesting them. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou