From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Anchors in texinfo export Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:46:57 +0100 Message-ID: <8738x0b1q6.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5fUK-0000Bm-ME for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:47:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5fUJ-0005rR-4O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:47:16 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:35626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5fUI-0005rD-VD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:47:15 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 16so1114405wgi.3 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:47:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Thomas S. Dye's message of "Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:31:52 -1000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: Org-mode Hello, tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Currently, the texinfo exporter translates a dedicated target in a comment: > > # <> This isn't a target. This is a comment that contains some text looking like Org syntax. > to this: > > @c <> > > I was expecting to see a texinfo anchor: > > @anchor{x-export-to-odt} > > There are a handful of these dedicated target comments cum anchors in the Org > mode manual. I believe all of them are in places where it would be easy > to replace them with links directly to the corresponding headline/node. > > Should I edit them away? Or, are dedicated target comments/anchors > something the texinfo exporter should handle? There are no such things as "dedicated targets". Though <> within a paragraph should be translated into some sort of anchor. Isn't it the case? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou