From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Breaking up long #+TBLFM line? Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:42:09 -0500 Message-ID: <8737tlzhce.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> References: <87lh7ksly4.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <2016-01-25T15-49-20@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87zivtwsxw.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNlCP-0002lC-Do for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:45:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNlCM-0002Cq-80 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:45:09 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNlCM-0002Bo-15 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:45:06 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aNlCK-0001r3-0m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:45:04 +0100 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:45:04 +0100 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:45:04 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Loris Bennett" writes: > Hi Karl, > > Karl Voit writes: > >> * Loris Bennett wrote: >>> Hi, >> >> Hi! >> >>> Is there any way to break up an overly long #+TBLFM line? >> >> The question is: why? > > Because, purely aesthetically, I don't like having a #+TBLFM line which > is 240 characters long when the window (and the table in it) is less > than chars wide. > >> My guess: you're missing the C-c ' (org-edit-special) which offers >> you a user-friendly way to modify formulas. > > You're right, I did know about C-c ' but not with table formulae. Nice! > > However, I still don't like the long #+TBLFM, although it's not going to > kill me. > That's good, because I think you'll have to live with it :-) There is support for multiple TBLFM lines, but not in the way you want: they are alternatives, rather than cumulative - see (info "(org) Editing and debugging formulas") the section entitled "Using multiple #+TBLFM lines". -- Nick