From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [patch] more robust footnotes Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:16:05 +0200 Message-ID: <8737p6fw0a.fsf@gmx.us> References: <1461444845.13483.6.camel@gmail.com> <87h9eqt74z.fsf@gmx.us> <87a8kivzcc.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <87r3durmc6.fsf@gmx.us> <87h9ep6hkx.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <874mapstdk.fsf@gmx.us> <87a8kh4wpp.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <87r3ctalx7.fsf@gmx.us> <87bn3w8nba.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <87k2ij895o.fsf_-_@gmx.us> <87h9dn87nn.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <87eg8r6srw.fsf@gmx.us> <87d1ob86m2.fsf@saiph.selenimh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54093) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5T3H-0006S0-3G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 03:16:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5T3D-0008Ew-QF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 03:16:23 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5T3D-0008Es-JG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 03:16:19 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b5T36-0006yI-U6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:16:12 +0200 Received: from ip-178-203-233-73.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de ([178.203.233.73]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:16:12 +0200 Received: from rasmus by ip-178-203-233-73.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:16:12 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > You don't seem to use the latter. Does it still make sense to provide > it? No. > I suggest to avoid calling repeatedly > `org-export-get-footnote-definition'. Also, if the footnote reference is > anonymous, there is no point in calling `org-element-map'. The following > is more efficient: > > (format "\\footnote{%s%s}" > (org-trim (org-export-data def info)) > ;; Only insert a label if there exist another reference to def. > (cond > ((not label) "") > ((org-element-map (plist-get info :parse-tree) 'footnote-reference > (lambda (f) > (and (not (eq f footnote-reference)) > (equal (org-element-property :label f) label) > (org-latex--label def info t t))) > info t)) > (t ""))) Thanks. I have pushed the change. Rasmus -- Er du tosset for noge' lårt!