From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Citation syntax: now supported in Pandoc Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 21:16:11 +0100 Message-ID: <8737i7e778.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87fumlc413.fsf@aquinas.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87polb4epm.fsf@aquinas.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXmG-0006na-7M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:16:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXmC-00032l-73 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:16:20 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:39164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cCXmC-00032T-1F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:16:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87polb4epm.fsf@aquinas.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (Richard Lawrence's message of "Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:44:05 -0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Richard Lawrence Cc: Org list Hello, Richard Lawrence writes: > Matt Price writes: > >> Richard, is wip-cite up to date with recent git versions of org-mode? > > Nope. At least, I have not done any work on this, and I don't know of > anyone else who has either. I suppose I should rebase it onto master > again, but it's hard to justify the effort unless someone is going to > actively work on it, because otherwise it will quickly get out of date. > (Unfortunately, I can't put much time into this, at least not in the > short term.) I rebased wip-cite onto master. I didn't test the branch but "make test" reports no problem. >> I'd like ot try it out but would rather not go back to a pre-9.0 >> version or org, having done a certain amount of work to update to the >> new framework... > > Well, I'd still recommend trying it with Pandoc (instead of trying to > get wip-cite to work). If there are issues with Pandoc's Org reader > post-9.0, those should be filed as bugs against Pandoc. I'd rather have some testing on the Org side. This is not a Pandoc-devel mailing list. Besides, we really need to move forward on this branch. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou