From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
Subject: Re: Versioning of worg content
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 18:29:03 +0200
Message-ID: <8737adtrg0.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
References: <20170106201728.GB24577@seven> <874luu0ypt.fsf@bzg.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50177)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1dS4E0-0006ry-HX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:29:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1dS4Dx-0003Xv-Bn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:29:24 -0400
Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=45033 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1dS4Dx-0003Ww-5G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 12:29:21 -0400
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1dS4Dm-0004Sa-7u
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 18:29:10 +0200
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien writes:
> No.  Worg needs love.  And yes, we could tag Worg's repository
> with Org-mode versions, the same as we would do with documentation.

If you are talking about the Git repository behind Worg, then:

a) Yes, we could give that repository version tags.
b) No, we shouldn't do that unless SomeOne™ keeps all of Worg consistent
with the Org releases.

If you are saying instead that the examples in Worg should be annotated
with the Org version that they were provided for (or last tested to be
working at), that would be good, but see b) above.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Wavetables for the Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldUserWavetables