From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: cautionary tale: avoid creating/using a macro called "title"
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 01:34:51 +0200
Message-ID: <8736zhmtic.fsf@bzg.fr>
References: <87y3iuh82n.fsf@gmail.com> <87po3y5jaw.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87vadp7kvc.fsf@delle7240.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <87k1u4wlsx.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87woy48nyc.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87d0zwv41o.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87a7v0b5o6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zi303w03.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87lgei9zy3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87muyxz7eq.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41844)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>)
	id 1fBqPf-0008DF-HU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 19:34:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1fBqPe-0001ZJ-KU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 19:34:55 -0400
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Eric S Fraga <esflists@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>

Hi Nicolas and Eric,

Eric S Fraga <esflists@gmail.com> writes:

> On Friday, 23 Mar 2018 at 23:42, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> A bit late, yet fixed. Thank you.
>
> Thank you!  Works fine now.  And I have increased confidence in my
> sanity. ;-)

Indeed, thanks for fixing this!  Let's all increase our confidence in
our sanity, that something we strongly need when debugging Emacs :)

-- 
 Bastien