bulk archive slow

bulk archive slow

[Samuel Wales]

in recent maint, bulk archive is slow for me.  not a huge deal but
org-element--current-element takes up 92 percent of cpu time in
profiler.  6 entries took a few minutes.  this is just a heads up in
case anybody can confirm.

-- 
The Kafka Pandemic

Please learn what misopathy is.
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2013/10/why-some-diseases-are-wronged.html

Re: bulk archive slow

[Ihor Radchenko]

Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:

> in recent maint, bulk archive is slow for me.  not a huge deal but
> org-element--current-element takes up 92 percent of cpu time in
> profiler.  6 entries took a few minutes.  this is just a heads up in
> case anybody can confirm.

Just a note that bulk archiving should be a lot faster on latest main.

Best,
Ihor

Re: bulk archive slow

[Samuel Wales]

thank you!  bulk archiving will be among the first things i will try
once i upgrade.  i have years[?] of doneified tasks now i think.

i always use maint, with my own few patches rebased on top, so not
sure if i can take advantage of it, except to run main to do it.

still will be highly useful.  i ahve kept these improvements to bulk
archving in mind as i consier upgrading.


this brings up a tangential question.  what was the reasoning behind
changing maint to bugfix and master to main?




On 11/23/21, Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> wrote:
> Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> in recent maint, bulk archive is slow for me.  not a huge deal but
>> org-element--current-element takes up 92 percent of cpu time in
>> profiler.  6 entries took a few minutes.  this is just a heads up in
>> case anybody can confirm.
>
> Just a note that bulk archiving should be a lot faster on latest main.
>
> Best,
> Ihor
>


-- 
The Kafka Pandemic

Please learn what misopathy is.
https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2013/10/why-some-diseases-are-wronged.html

Re: bulk archive slow

[Ihor Radchenko]

Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:

> thank you!  bulk archiving will be among the first things i will try
> once i upgrade.  i have years[?] of doneified tasks now i think.
>
> i always use maint, with my own few patches rebased on top, so not
> sure if i can take advantage of it, except to run main to do it.

If you think that your patches could be also useful for others, feel
free to send them here.

> this brings up a tangential question.  what was the reasoning behind
> changing maint to bugfix and master to main?

AFAIU, master -> main is the USA thing where word "master" is considered
sensitive (and Org is released under FSF, based in USA).

maint -> bugfix is probably to avoid too similar branch names. I am not
sure here.

Best,
Ihor