From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id ADfyJqBlVWdH8gAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 09:23:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id ADfyJqBlVWdH8gAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 10:23:44 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=EHOl4uob; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1733649824; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=TTAUUJ1E9szRqmCtwLpflHVrPhf0QI21Dm3O57bzuR1LtWlcSrV/W8k0thpOWbelVh2plY M0vnv6lSieU0qevhRJufHcvSKBVFkkjeorYxsEJmmW7/b8bT70idw24LBvYWd7sH+0HOvZ U9R/k9A2ix2gSTWXYvKgPh0nzh1PL0pRRpaU3QEa4r8MUqbl3LRuP4Tt6bDIUaFgHHAKvN YxNTxK83Kpd5lwl3VyKxPUjHr+AIQF7NtdsSKMXOW0efU+LJbp7xHBYKDcOH3xzCwIKYd4 XkAvEwYGCrc1jhRRDnB2pa66L5vPGhoSsebKJACKz5jBk0Xx5fmivFRUi5q5aA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=EHOl4uob; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1733649824; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=hLfWq/kTU0QdsaPI4Bpl0nTkW3CCVvPEZ+HAtPajadY=; b=UxcwUYZ3nFkiVgNH5QbXZpGAJAyQ+ZMdVbzRIx+Bi/pJYTp7NhQITPw0mjgan769RT1uF1 aiKJCYXG40tB0gKxywpPUHPbhKLwoNNz+3F0fn/7m2kIZtEjA3pDnG5lU7XPQjsu26bngJ dIAZQxPM3hZHjU+QmmK/pRMb41DnxZLY/M8tVCQx+YNRFk1kWbClDPHVRw1Hz6oYAzcicX CocD5NEJ1ryRQh8dljK2WuoBCwbDfPxzoY4mDhZRhF0pDe0srAEGFH2KGcHRhwhttYKrO8 ZNey2emI5w589Zk9owmR7z9YI1q9rAbKNHRUyiJ1xo8RGlWd6jgTn0hXRsFzQw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE281B7F1 for ; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 10:23:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tKDV9-0003MJ-Gj; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 04:22:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tKDV8-0003MB-0M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 04:22:54 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tKDV5-0004Bl-1o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 04:22:53 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B09240101 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2024 10:22:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1733649767; bh=hLfWq/kTU0QdsaPI4Bpl0nTkW3CCVvPEZ+HAtPajadY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=EHOl4uobCn0SD5L8M+K8v8eHqPibuzqHd/u23o8MvVdvGRMY5MdpdKoOrmaTOA42k rcwe+m8BN2+NRaN+frSbw17eN5rUq7jBCq+gRndOimYcJPrk3du08l1OjMYeQs2BqP LbYVcFvHahojHt0wd7fQwth2YpQpamzx+pim7E3fVQV4gtRhVqoNu9ATTvZkf3zxDG dZDO114nxeSOtQIUPoOKIfX2lcvjlJw4whXqkjJ6dTApl1dj8EhxMi3LfsSqeBhD2Y Cp0Jxkna4W+KBdKMQwaATGCoXmcMwLsX7ZwUT019/EbN/6lgeBhqIxpH2dk0EDzOC1 LQJ1ujOqrI5tw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Y5ffZ4Dszz9rxL; Sun, 8 Dec 2024 10:22:46 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Gendre Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: Feature discussion: Search field and local search engine In-Reply-To: <87ikrv41yi.fsf@k-7.ch> References: <87a5ev31ul.fsf@k-7.ch> <878quf1ji0.fsf@k-7.ch> <87h692vi6i.fsf@localhost> <87v7xixwkr.fsf@k-7.ch> <87ed45o27k.fsf@localhost> <87h6858qch.fsf@k-7.ch> <874j3xapon.fsf@localhost> <87ikrv41yi.fsf@k-7.ch> Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 09:24:17 +0000 Message-ID: <8734iyfry6.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.07 X-Spam-Score: -6.07 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BEE281B7F1 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: zXjrFaumdSoi S=C3=A9bastien Gendre writes: >>> - Can search with only frontend components (no backend needed) >> >> These are probably not necessary, unless it makes your life easier for >> the purposes of implementation. > > Do you think we need to also support search engines that use a backend > software=C2=A0? > > It's a possibility, but it would mean more search engines to evaluate > and more work to support the two scenarios (full static and static page > + dynamic search engine). In other words, it will make life easier for you to limit to frontend-based search engines. So, feel free to limit your search to a subset of search engines :) Note that we are not really looking to actually support all these engines. From my point of view, the screening you need to do simply aims to design search engine support in such a way that it is *not impossible* to add support for an arbitrary search engine. We may actually support (out of the box) a single engine. The key is to allow interested users use other engines. If they have to write some Elisp to do that, it is fine. --=20 Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at