emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
To: org-mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: property searches for #+CATEGORY
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:15:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871wb2p2f9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071107111730.GH13544@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> (Adam Spiers's message of "Wed, 7 Nov 2007 11:17:30 +0000")

Adam Spiers <orgmode@adamspiers.org> writes:

> I have several personal .org files, and several work-related ones too.
> In each personal file, I have a line:
>
>   #+CATEGORY: personal
>   
> and in each work-related file, I have a line:
>
>   #+CATEGORY: work
>
> I would like to be able to bind agenda custom commands to do tag
> searches which are narrowed to one of these categories, e.g. "show me
> all personal priority #A tasks".  Such a search needs to span *all*
> agenda files, therefore the standard per-buffer narrowing provided by
> the '<' binding in the *Agenda Commands* buffer is insufficient.
>
> Would it make sense to include CATEGORY as a special property?  After
> all, pretty much all other per-task meta-data ("TODO", "PRIORITY"
> etc.) are already available via the property interface, and this way,
> I could easily achieve what I need with tag searches such as
>
>   CATEGORY="personal"+PRIORITY="A"

I understand now.

I think it would be clearer to distinguish between categorizing files
and categorizing tasks.  In a sense, using #+CATEGORY across several
files (as you do) is more a way to group these files under the same
ombrella (conveniently called "category"), rather than to group all
tasks below each #+CATEGORY in the same category.

Let me say it with other words: if several files share the same
#+CATEGORY, then this bit of information won't be of any help to
distinguish between these files' tasks, it will only help separating
files with #+CATEGORY: A from files with #+CATEGORY: B.

Then I think the right solution would be to have groups of agenda files.
Something like:

  #+AGENDA_GROUP: personal

This would let you restrict any agenda search to a group of agenda
files.  I don't want to digg too far in this direction, but I think
there are a few other things for which such groups might be useful 
(e.g. publish agenda files per group...)

My other concern is that the functionality you're requesting would
resurrect #+CATEGORY, while this functionality was mostly maintained 
for backward compatibility -- at least I understood it like that.  
It's not that easy for users to understand how to user categories, 
and staying with two ways of setting them might be confusing IMO.

PS: Personally, the problem you encounter is exactly the one that 
led me to use a single (really) big Org file.  But this is entirely
personal, of course!

-- 
Bastien

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-07 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-07 11:17 property searches for #+CATEGORY Adam Spiers
2007-11-07 12:49 ` Bastien
2007-11-07 12:15   ` Adam Spiers
2007-11-07 13:23 ` Tim O'Callaghan
2007-11-07 13:34   ` Adam Spiers
2007-11-07 13:59     ` Tim O'Callaghan
2007-11-07 14:28       ` Adam Spiers
2007-11-07 14:52         ` Tim O'Callaghan
2007-11-07 16:35           ` Adam Spiers
2007-11-07 16:15       ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-07 18:07         ` Adam Spiers
2007-11-08  4:55         ` Bastien
2007-11-08  8:54           ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-07 14:49     ` Bastien
2007-11-07 14:32       ` Adam Spiers
2007-11-07 14:15 ` Bastien [this message]
2007-11-07 13:52   ` Adam Spiers
2007-11-07 17:16     ` Bastien
2007-11-07 17:23       ` Adam Spiers
2007-11-08  4:42         ` Bastien
2007-11-07 16:20   ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-08  0:04     ` Adam Spiers
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-07 23:35 Mario E. Munich
2008-12-08 16:40 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-12-09  0:33   ` Mario E. Munich
2008-12-09  1:41     ` Matthew Lundin
2008-12-09  6:51       ` Mario E. Munich
2008-12-07 23:39 Mario E. Munich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871wb2p2f9.fsf@bzg.ath.cx \
    --to=bzg@altern.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).