From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: new exporter
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:44:34 +0200
Message-ID: <871ulqgb4t.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <3C38420E-E2FA-4CAB-B3FD-9C5F8584E60A@gmail.com>
	<81fwadrgoo.fsf@gmail.com> <87396dzlai.fsf_-_@Rainer.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40127)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1ScigI-000638-MX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:47:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1ScigG-00081f-Qe
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:47:42 -0400
Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:57549)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1ScigG-00081Z-Hd
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:47:40 -0400
Received: by eekb47 with SMTP id b47so500982eek.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87396dzlai.fsf_-_@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of
	p"Sat, 02 Jun 2012 19:16:37 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:

>here's my first stab on fixing some of that:
>
> From d7ef1bfbaef873521731697d86112029f02cdc8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@Stromeko.DE>
> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 18:38:24 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 5/5] Make byte-compiler more happy
>
> * contrib/lisp/org-e-ascii.el: Remove declarations and replace with
>   require.
>
> * contrib/lisp/org-e-html.el: Remove declarations and replace with
>   require.
>
> * contrib/lisp/org-e-latex.el: Remove declarations and replace with
>   require.
>
> * contrib/lisp/org-e-publish.el: Remove declarations and replace with
>   require.
>
> * contrib/lisp/org-export.el: Remove declarations and replace with
>   require.  Prevent byte-compilation, it currently would produce an
>   error due to circular dependencies in the file.

declarations (instead of requires) are here to avoid circular
dependencies. Why do you want to revert that in the first place?

> The way org-export is structured unfortunately produces circular
> dependencies due to the dispatcher and that prevents it from being
> compiled properly.

I think that adding autoload cookies on export functions and removing
requires in the dispatcher should solve most problems.

> One of test fails (but independently of compiling or not compiling the
> rest of the new exporter).  The failing test is
> test-org-element/src-block-interpreter, it appears that the test
> expects the block to be indented by two spaces, but it starts at the
> beginning of line for me.  Maybe some configuration is missing, but in
> any case that should be provided by the test.

It should be fixed now. Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou