From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ox bug] batch export seems to be broken or have changed Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 10:21:14 +0200 Message-ID: <871tg4v9qd.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87h9pf4opz.fsf@gmx.us> <87h9p1ewdy.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnf9jhw4.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGjp2-0006mo-Av for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 04:19:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGjp1-0005Lt-F1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 04:19:44 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:34385) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZGjp1-0005Ll-8Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 04:19:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bnf9jhw4.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:05:47 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > I hope you had a pleasant break from the PC. I did. Thank you for you work meanwhile. I will do it again in 5 days, for another week. > I still see the problem. Are you tracking Emacs-git? I'm not. > I'm currently using: > > commit fa5a880f733cbbe3b0d515ed3e1cf7c6fd54cfd8 > Date: Thu Jul 16 20:04:07 2015 +0200 > > My Makefile calling something similar to the above is not working on my PC > and asks for an input file. `org-export-output-file-name' only asks for an input file if current buffer is not associated to any file (i.e. when (buffer-file-name (buffer-base-buffer)) is nil). Has Emacs 25 changed --file option behaviour? > I tried to downgrade to Emacs 24.5, but when I batch export as above I > get: > > Symbol's function definition is void: cl-struct-define That doesn't ring a bell. Regards,