From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [DEV] Bump Emacs requirement to 24.4?
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 21:50:32 +0200
Message-ID: <871tf4pbzr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87io8tfrtk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vbctieu3.fsf@gmx.us>
	<20150806074217.00177cc9@zotac> <87lhdohmii.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87bnekrfgi.fsf@gmx.us> <874mk15862.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87pp2povpl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y4hddl2y.fsf@free.fr>
	<87a8tsq4d9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zj1sk4uf.fsf@free.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51871)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZQhRq-0003o4-MF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 15:48:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZQhRp-0004tT-Qt
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 15:48:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87zj1sk4uf.fsf@free.fr> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Sat, 15
	Aug 2015 16:23:52 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>

Bastien Guerry <bzg@gnu.org> writes:

> No.  You asked weather it was fine to require Emacs 24.4 in your
> original message, then people pointed out that Emacs 24.3 was still
> widely used, then you said it was fine to require Emacs 24.3, just
> Emacs 24.4 was "icing on the cake".

That's correct, excepted that you were the first to ask "why 24.4 and
not 24.3"? So I assumed it was between 24.3 and 24.4.

> This is not a light decision, as we cannot move back, and I don't
> see the need for rushing here.

There is no rushing, really. Emacs 24 was released in 2012, and lexical
binding is a huge step forward for developers. There is some serious
work involved to make the jump (along with cl-lib switch), so the sooner
we can start, the better.

Regards,