From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Cross Subject: Re: TODO do not display in org-agenda mode Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 08:32:07 +1000 Message-ID: <871scusdjs.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1529952742.local-7098f468-9af0-v1.2.2-96fb3a99@getmailspring.com> <87vaa6ecgi.fsf@ossau.homelinux.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55569) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fXa1v-00073f-DL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 18:32:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fXa1u-0000Xm-Gi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 18:32:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]:43407) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fXa1u-0000Wb-9O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 18:32:14 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id y8-v6so7102867pfm.10 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:32:13 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <87vaa6ecgi.fsf@ossau.homelinux.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Neil Jerram Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C3=ABl?= Chlon , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" 'spacemacs" is just a pre-configured version of emacs. I personally don't like spacemacs, but I have 'stolen' some of their configuration for my own setup. I find these pre-configured versions of emacs (spacemacs, prelude, better-defaults, Purcell's emacs.d, emagicians, etc) to be good references and a place for getting ideas, but just using them has a significant downside - you end up running an emacs configuration you don't really understand and are then at the mercy of others when it comes to problem diagnosis. Tim Neil Jerram writes: > Micha=C3=ABl Chlon writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I have spacemacs and write some org files. > > By the way, does anyone else find "spacemacs" bothering? Unlike > previous things like MicroEmacs, which have somehow always been clear to > me to be very different things from Emacs, I get the impression that > "spacemacs" users think that Emacs communities should be able to help > them in detail, which suggests that they think it's basically the same > thing. > > But if it's the same as Emacs, why use a different name that makes me > hesitate / worry over whether it might be different from Emacs? > > On the other hand, if it's different from Emacs, does it still make > sense to ask for support here? > > I'm genuinely in the dark here, although inclined to think that forking > the name (of Emacs) is a subtly damaging thing to do; so interested > either to be put right or to hear other opinions. > > Regards, > Neil --=20 Tim Cross