Re: comment section with latex_header

[Sebastien Vauban <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>]

Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Robert Klein <RoKlein-dMgjidx2iAaELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> this patch also breaks this kind of construct where not the table is
>> exported, but the one created from the booktabs() call:
>>
>>
>> ---> begin example <---
>>   * Grundlagen
>>   *** COMMENT unexported subtree with table source
>>   #+tblname: masse
>
> This is deprecated. Use #+name: instead.
>
>>   | 1 gestr. Teelffel   | 1 gestr. Elffel       | 1 Tasse     |
>>   | ca. 5 ccm           | ca 15 ccm             | ca 120 ccm  |
>>   |---------------------+-----------------------+-------------|
>>   | Zimt 2 g            | Haferflocken 8 g      | Mehl 80 g   |
>>   | Paprika 2 g         | Speisestärke 9 g      | Grieß 96 g  |
>>   | Speisestärke 2--3 g | Mehl, Semmelmehl 10 g | Zucker 90 g |
>>   | Zucker 4 g          | Salz, Zucker, Öl 15 g |             |
>>   | Salz 5 g            | Reis, Butter 15 g     |             |
>>
>>   ** Maße und Gewichte
>>
>>   #+call: booktabs(table=masse, align="lll") :results latex :exports results
>> ---> end example <---
>
> Good catch. The line between data that can be accessed and data that
> cannot in a commented subtree is blurry.

Can't we say that a COMMENT'ed subtree is like having all of its
contents commented, line by line?  IOW, nothing "accessible"?

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban