From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastien Vauban Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 11:40:36 +0100 Message-ID: <868uf64fob.fsf@example.com> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87386775gc.fsf@gmx.us> <87vbj3jdg6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hello Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Honestly, Org is already full of cryptic symbols, e.g., {{{...}}} > @@...@@, <<<....>>>, <<...>>, and so on. This is not worse than the > rest of Org. What is <<<...>>>? PS- Not easy to search for that in the Org manual in Emacs: neither << nor <<< are in the index, though I know about the first one (Noweb). PPS- Before, I could use C-s to go through pages which would contain <<. Now, I don't know if that's because of a change on my side, that does not work anymore... Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban