From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: No dot in datepicker dialog
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:23:48 +0200
Message-ID: <846C2072-E035-4403-BD96-FDC72999FC61@gmail.com>
References: <2013-03-26T20-43-10@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
	<87hajm1mpa.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20130404141946.GE16563@boo.workgroup>
	<CALn3zohFzW=-oOFwCzDeJf1roq5xGzCoHua+pcyePYN55XL=Sg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87zjwo2w0a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39135)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1UUuzb-0007zP-He
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:23:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1UUuzZ-0002wv-LC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:23:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87zjwo2w0a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>, Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


On 24.4.2013, at 10:06, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi Michael,
> 
> Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> Yes, this is how it worked and I was used to before too, very
>> convenient.
> 
> This is how it works again.

How about testing for 

   (= (point) (1+ (length prompt)))

instead of

   (= (char-before) 32)

?

- Carsten