From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CONCERN] Orgmode version string
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 23:46:59 +0530
Message-ID: <81k4l2chd0.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <8162wmze0s.fsf@gmail.com> <8762wm5s3j.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39613 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PBX2K-0008JN-Te
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:17:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1PBX2J-0008WR-U6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:17:16 -0400
Received: from mail-gw0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:41119)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1PBX2J-0008WN-OJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:17:15 -0400
Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11so1786041gwb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8762wm5s3j.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Thu, 28 Oct 2010
	16:06:56 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Bastien

> Can you suggest a new default for `version-regexp-alist' so that
> 7.01 is considered older than 7.10?

I assume there is a typo here. Just for the sake of clarification:

(version-list-= (version-to-list "7.01") (version-to-list "7.1")) is t
(version-list-< (version-to-list "7.01") (version-to-list "7.10")) is t

Note that the following difference in above expressions
1. '=' and '<'
2. 7.1 and 7.10

Jambunathan K>