From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien_Vauban?= Subject: Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:29:48 +0100 Message-ID: <80y66jvpwz.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> References: <87lj2ukfia.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4icegwl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87wrmbwdsm.fsf@gmail.com> <87aaj5tbgl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87bp3ka458.fsf@gmail.com> <87hbd8kgqw.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org Hi Eric, "Eric Schulte" wrote: > I've just pushed up a new header argument combination ":comments noweb" > which will wrap all embedded noweb sections in link comments, as > demonstrated in the following example. Hopefully this should be > sufficient for a complete mapping from a pure code file back to the > original org-mode file. If I understand correctly, this is some sort of enhancement to the ":commen= ts yes" option. If yes, is there a reason to have both values, with subtle differences? Shouldn't we port the behavior of ":comments noweb" to the ":comments yes" value? Best regards, Seb --=20 S=C3=A9bastien Vauban _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode