Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language

["Sébastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Eric,

"Eric Schulte" wrote:
> Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf-geNee64TY+gS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
>>> I've just pushed up a new header argument combination ":comments noweb"
>>> which will wrap all embedded noweb sections in link comments, as
>>> demonstrated in the following example.  Hopefully this should be
>>> sufficient for a complete mapping from a pure code file back to the
>>> original org-mode file.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, this is some sort of enhancement to the ":comments
>> yes" option.
>>
>> If yes, is there a reason to have both values, with subtle differences?
>> Shouldn't we port the behavior of ":comments noweb" to the ":comments yes"
>> value?
>
> Yes, the reason to retain both variants is that in the case of short
> noweb references embedded in a single line, e.g.
>
> #+source: first
> #+begin_src ruby
>   5
> #+end_src
>
> #+begin_src ruby :noweb yes
>   <<first>> + 6
> #+end_src
>
> the yes option would be preferable, as the insertion of comments around
> the noweb reference would result in adding line breaks around the
> reference and possibly breaking new-line sensitive code.

I see. I do second your choice...

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sébastien Vauban


_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode