From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pete phillips <pete@smtl.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Re: PocketMod for org-mode
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:14:13 +0100
Message-ID: <7945.1192623253@lap1.smtl.co.uk>
References: <87zlyiprzz.fsf@novell.com> <874pgqpken.fsf@cantor.griswold.home>
	<m2ejfuyt3z.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ii7nF-0007Gp-Oq
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:14:33 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ii7nD-0007Gd-F1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:14:32 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ii7nD-0007Ga-AQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:14:31 -0400
Received: from [193.131.77.175] (helo=mailhost.smtl.co.uk)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <pete@smtl.co.uk>) id 1Ii7nC-0003VP-Ui
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:14:31 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:42:56 BST."
	<m2ejfuyt3z.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

>>>>> "Leo" == Leo  <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:

    > On 2007-10-17 03:03 +0100, Dan Griswold wrote:
    >> Also, a little gotcha I've found, which may catch some of us
    >> org-mode GTD-ers: cal-tex.el does not check for the @ symbol when
    >> inputting from the diary, and thus does not escape it, leading to
    >> latex-errors on processing.

    Leo> This probably should be reported to emacs-devel.

As an interim measure, if you patch the Makefile as follows:

Change:

	%.dvi: %.tex
		$(LATEX) $^
to
	%.dvi: %.tex
		sed 's/\\verb|@|/\@/g' < $< > /tmp/temp-org-file.$$$$; mv /tmp/temp-org-file.$$$$ $<
		$(LATEX) $^

On the basis that any '@'s get changed to \verb|@|, it just escapes
them. Clearly only a temporary measure!
Pete