From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org-capture and blank lines
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:19:42 +0200
Message-ID: <75678B38-A3BF-4ADD-A9E4-25EA47764D80@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik3_0JW3XOJabw2mUWsUJmOBX_0FQ1apzkY22PK@mail.gmail.com>
	<8DEE7E6B-DD11-41A0-9FE5-2CFD73EB33E3@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikYUUxx-6Nd2Kvg2wCdM+uPFtMezUv8EUX43_=g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36694 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrQYu-0004jT-LA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:19:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1OrQYt-0001hD-7U
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:19:48 -0400
Received: from postduif.ic.uva.nl ([145.18.40.180]:39927)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1OrQYs-0001gg-Ve
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:19:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikYUUxx-6Nd2Kvg2wCdM+uPFtMezUv8EUX43_=g@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Sep 3, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:

> Hi C,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> On 2010-09-02, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Then, at kill time, when I am cleaning up, it is hard to tell if  
>> there
>> was an empty line originally....
>
> In my case, there is never one, FWIW.  I.e. the following never
> happens deliberately.
>
>  * target
>
>  ** new entry
>
> Nor this.
>
>  * target
>  text
>
>  ** new entry
>
> So in principle it's OK to clean it up for users like me, in case you
> decide to make that optional.  I'd enable that.

Well, maybe I can do some more work on this.  We'll see.

>
> In any case, again, capture is superb.  Safe and fast.

You contriburted an important idea to this imnplementation....

- Carsten