From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu>
Subject: Re: Splitting mailing list
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:53:44 -0500
Message-ID: <74194.1298847224@iu.edu>
References: <87k4gldb1s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org>
	<87pqqdprxe.fsf@altern.org>
	<20110228074935.bf0d7ebf.alantyree@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50289 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PtpUv-00033p-B5
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:53:58 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ajk@iu.edu>) id 1PtpUq-0005R0-73
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:53:53 -0500
Received: from locrian.uiso.iu.edu ([149.166.143.64]:53244)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ajk@iu.edu>)
	id 1PtpUq-0005Ql-2l
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:53:48 -0500
Received: from iu.edu (cpe-173-89-199-0.indy.res.rr.com [173.89.199.0])
	by locrian.uiso.iu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 56B284202FB
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2011 17:53:45 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <20110228074935.bf0d7ebf.alantyree@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Alan L Tyree <alantyree@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm purely a user, but I would not be in favour of splitting the list.
> I find it interesting to have an insight into what the developers are
> doing, where org is headed.  Use of a DEV tag would be good.

I don't understand.  If you like to read the development posts, why not
subscribe to both lists?  My concerns with a DEV tag are twofold: people
would forget to add it, and it clutters the subject line.

Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> wrote:

> The thing that is most difficult for me is the fact that I almost
> never can read the entire subject header.  Often I get to read only
> the first word.  Tags will make that worse.

It was suggested once that we shorten the [Orgmode] tag to [Org].  That
seems like a change everyone can agree with.  Could one of the mailing
list admins please make that change?

Thanks,
ajk