From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Bibliographic references Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:03:02 -0500 Message-ID: <7330.1324072982@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <1324071794.3325.1@windy> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41831) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rbfs5-00084x-KR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:03:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rbfs4-0000Xj-I8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:03:17 -0500 Received: from g6t0186.atlanta.hp.com ([15.193.32.63]:40801) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rbfs4-0000UN-DM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:03:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message from Alan L Tyree of "Sat, 17 Dec 2011 08:43:14 +1100." <1324071794.3325.1@windy> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alan L Tyree Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Alan L Tyree wrote: > I feel like this should be googleable, but I'm not having much luck. > > As Eric mentioned in a recent post, one of the nice things about > writing in org is that there is no need to worry about output format. > He did say "mostly" I think... > Except in one thing: How do I deal with bibliographic citations so that > the output is sensible in the different formats? How do I get \cite > {key} to export properly in XHTML and odt as well as in LaTeX? > ... and I believe this is one area that is not covered by the "mostly" umbrella :) > Sorry if this is obvious to everybody else -- I'm stymied. > I don't know of an answer either. I'd like to find out that I'm wrong. Nick