From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 09:37:47 +0200 Message-ID: <6500482A-2E3D-4311-889B-77E33F82E72A@gmail.com> References: <86sk7gooh2.fsf@portan.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> <3E3E058D-6BBD-4D9B-845D-3E13235EF0DC@gmail.com> <4BB3973D.3090305@comcast.net> <9667B267-935B-4DFB-800B-FC76DBCCBF28@gmail.com> <8739z8g3ul.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> <871ves8t5f.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> <2D73D1C7-5BEF-46D2-9A56-4F4321005550@gmail.com> <87wrwk7cf7.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> <6DA7F0F0-D60E-4214-889A-C5A135970E7B@tsdye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NzPpo-0001ES-Kv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:38:00 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33186 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NzPpl-0001DP-WC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:38:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzPpe-0003eP-Pk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:37:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com ([209.85.219.214]:34384) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzPpe-0003e3-9F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:37:50 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so45657ewy.32 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:37:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6DA7F0F0-D60E-4214-889A-C5A135970E7B@tsdye.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Robert Klein On Apr 6, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: > On Apr 6, 2010, at 8:30 AM, Robert Klein wrote: > >> On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:50:36 +0200, Karsten Heymann > > wrote: >> >>>> Thanks a lot for all this, I will follow your advice. >>>> >>>> One final question: Will any of these packages spoil the fun for >>>> people who want to process through .dvi instead of directly to pdf? >>> >>> Not as far as I know. hyperref and microtype will run with reduced >>> features, but apart from that, there should be no problem. Regarding >>> microtype, I do not know what happens when it is used with the old >>> TeX >>> or eTeX compiler that was used to created dvi's before pdftex was >>> used >>> for this too, but that should largely be an academic problem as >>> pdftex >>> is now used anywhere. >>> >> >> >> In a minimal document it runs Ok with pdfeTeX, for both creating >> dvi and pdf. >> (The one in teTeX 3.0.) >> >> >> Best regards >> Robert >> > > Aloha all, > > From the microtype documentation: > >> The microtype package does not work with XETEX. Does that mean it will break running XETEX, or will i just be ignored? - Carsten