From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: HTML export: no date in postamble unless set manually Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:10:29 -0500 Message-ID: <5710.1361823029@alphaville> References: Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43545) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UA4Ne-0006oC-3H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:10:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UA4Nb-0002Vf-N0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:10:33 -0500 Received: from g1t0026.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.33]:31083) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UA4Nb-0002VI-HK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:10:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message from Richard Stanton of "Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:03:41 GMT." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard Stanton Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Richard Stanton wrote: > I have org-export-html-postamble set to t. When I export a simple org > file that has no explicit #+date line (using the new exporter), I get a > line that says "Date:" at the bottom of the resulting HTML file, but > there's no date listed next to it. If I add an explicit #+date line, it is > correctly transferred to the bottom of the HTML file, but wouldn't it make > sense to have today's date listed if no explicit alternative is provided? > At any rate, adding a line that says "Date:" with nothing after the colon > doesn't seem like the optimal default setting. > The backend-specific variables have been renamed in the new exporter: try org-html-postamble. Check the FAQ: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#new-exporter-switch for more details. Nick