From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Randby Subject: Re: Stable releases Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:06:54 -0400 Message-ID: <55CB994E.3050908@gmail.com> References: <55CA2E6B.4060102@gmail.com> <87bnec9zmr.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPbMZ-0003W9-2k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:06:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPbMV-0001JO-SL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:06:59 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]:36464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPbMV-0001JF-Nd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:06:55 -0400 Received: by iodv127 with SMTP id v127so14170241iod.3 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (cpe-184-56-99-2.neo.res.rr.com. [184.56.99.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o19sm11016257igi.14.2015.08.12.12.06.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:06:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bnec9zmr.fsf@Rainer.invalid> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 08/12/2015 01:37 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Scott Randby writes: >> While I've used Org's development version in the past, I stopped doing >> that due to my failure to learn how to use git (no time) and other >> issues. Now, I only use the stable releases. But the latest 8.3 >> release doesn't seem so stable to me, so I'd like some clarification >> about what the Org maintainers mean by a stable release. Perhaps this >> is too vague, so let me explain a bit. > > There are no stable releases, but major and minor ones (see > README_maintainer). Major releases are developed in the master branch > and include backwards-incompatible changes as well as new and removed > features. Minor releases are made from the maint branch and are kept > backwards compatible to the last major release (only bug fixes, no new > features, no feature removal). If there are no stable releases, then maybe the web site should not say: "Stable version 8.3.1 (Aug. 2015)." Perhaps "stable" should just be eliminated from that phrase. Certainly, the use of "stable" confused me. Scott