From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniele Nicolodi Subject: Re: Org-mode exporters licensing Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:30:11 +0200 Message-ID: <55B678B3.50900@grinta.net> References: <87io962fdz.fsf@mbork.pl> <87a8uigff8.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87a8ui2cxl.fsf@mbork.pl> <87twsqeyku.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87r3ntvmuq.fsf@mbork.pl> <55B62153.4070904@grinta.net> <87d1zdv6o2.fsf@mbork.pl> <55B6724C.4040509@grinta.net> <874mkpv4wr.fsf@mbork.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36922) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJnFc-0003sI-7S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:35:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJn9y-0004W4-Pn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:30:05 -0400 Received: from zed.grinta.net ([109.74.203.128]:47844) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJn9y-0004VF-G7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:29:58 -0400 Received: from macbook-nicolodi.obspm.fr (macbook-nicolodi.obspm.fr [145.238.204.178]) (Authenticated sender: daniele) by zed.grinta.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6175B600C for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:29:57 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <874mkpv4wr.fsf@mbork.pl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 27/07/15 20:20, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > > On 2015-07-27, at 20:02, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > >> On 27/07/15 19:42, Marcin Borkowski wrote: >>> That I've already learned. OTOH, one of the reasons to use PD might be >>> that I explicitly state that I object the legal system I live in. (Mind >>> you: I'm not an anarchist, and I'm very far from that. But this system >>> is almost unbearable.) >> >> This statement confirms that you do not really understand what you are >> talking about: as you cannot renounce your copy rights, you cannot place >> something in the public domain. If you do not release your work with an >> explicit license, the default copyright protection law applies and this >> means (in all jurisdictions I know about) that you reserve all rights to >> yourself: none can use your code, and probably not even look at it. > > I do understand (at least I think so). And I do understand that my > declaration of putting something in PD would be technically void. > I just don't care about it, if the declaration of intent is clear. If you do not care about the terms in which who receives your work is able to use it, why all the discussion? I thought that you were arguing that a less strict license than the GPL is better for the content of a possible tutorial and you were inquiring if you could release your code derived or inspired from GPL code with another license. Now you say that you do not care, or better you say that you do not want to give any rights to who receives your code. I think you are confused. Cheers, Daniele