From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaidheeswaran C Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:38:41 +0530 Message-ID: <54EC2379.9050106@gmail.com> References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87bnkvm8la.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87zj8co3se.fsf@berkeley.edu> Reply-To: vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQ9Zp-0003Ob-F9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 02:06:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQ9Zl-0004wu-Uf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 02:06:41 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22c]:41816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YQ9Zl-0004wl-NM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 02:06:37 -0500 Received: by pdno5 with SMTP id o5so31361227pdn.8 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:06:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87zj8co3se.fsf@berkeley.edu> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Richard Lawrence Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Tuesday 17 February 2015 10:48 PM, Richard Lawrence wrote: > Another, more serious reason is that I work in a field where some > journals do not accept LaTeX submissions, or disprefer them; so > having some citation support in ODT export is important.) You are lobbying for two things: 1. An improvement in existing citation syntax. 2. Citation support for ODT backend. If you need help with ODT/JabRef integration, I am willing to lend a hand. (Only thing is) I would expect that someone hand-hold me wrt what one wants in the final exporter on a case-by-case basis. I would rather build bottom-up, rather than top-down.