From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaidheeswaran C Subject: Re: ODT export: Issues with `org-export-footnote-first-reference-p' Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:16:27 +0530 Message-ID: <54DADEA3.8070701@gmail.com> References: <54DA141C.1080407@gmail.com> <8761b9xxo9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLPCy-0006VD-DV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:47:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLPCs-0005zm-7T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:47:28 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:41007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLPCs-0005zW-1q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:47:22 -0500 Received: by pdno5 with SMTP id o5so1777416pdn.8 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:47:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.43.83] ([117.96.15.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ph7sm20892056pbb.6.2015.02.10.20.47.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:47:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8761b9xxo9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Wednesday 11 February 2015 02:59 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Vaidheeswaran C writes: > >> That said, it is difficult for me to conceive of a footnote that is >> referenced solely by other footnotes. i.e., it is reasonable to assume >> that a given footnote is either not referenced at all or is referenced >> atleast once in the main text itself. > > There's no need to make such an assumption. I still think that the snippet I shared should have worked. Clearly `org-export-footnote-first-reference-p' is misbehaving. > Using link-target within the footnotes should be fixed. Thank you. This could be a workaround. But it introduces the overhead of conjuring up a new link. Instead of sneaking a <<>> link right in to the text, another alternative would be to go with: #+NAME: test [fn:1] footdef1. > Regards, >