From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Differences html/pdf
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:50:44 +0100
Message-ID: <534212BF-E986-4F60-A4FB-BBD00DE08F0C@gmail.com>
References: <loom.20091028T151353-45@post.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N3AnU-0006ZZ-Ml
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:50:52 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N3AnQ-0006VL-NP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:50:52 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39143 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3AnQ-0006Ul-CE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:50:48 -0400
Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:40925)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1N3AnP-0007wQ-Bg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:50:47 -0400
Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so979337ewy.42
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20091028T151353-45@post.gmane.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:16 PM, andrea Crotti wrote:

> I normally prefer to export to pdf but I see that there are
> some differences.
>
> I added
> #+OPTIONS: toc:nil \n:nil todo:nil
> and
>
> toc is not exported in both, todo are anyway always exported

This is about the TODO keywords, and they are stripped in both

> and newline are kept only in html.

>
> In the latex version they're not exported for some reasons...

That is correct, we have not implemented keeping all line breaks in  
LaTeX.
Too hard, unfortunately.

- Carsten