Re: Bad footnotes when including org files

[Xavier Garrido <xavier.garrido@gmail.com>]

Hi Nicolas,

Le 26/03/2014 15:41, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Xavier Garrido <xavier.garrido@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Thanks for your answer. Maybe I will try your solution. Otherwise
>> I will run a "before-parse-hook" to change fn:XX to something unique
>> (by adding buffer name for example.
>
> We could do it by default.
>
> One problem is that INCLUDE keyword is a very simple feature. For
> example, if you include two files in a row and the first one ends with
> a footnote section, the other one will be included in that section and,
> therefore, not exported. So if we start to make it smart, we could be
> tempted to add too many other checks.
>
> Anyway, here's a patch for that.
>
> WDYT?
>

Applied, tested and it works like a charm. I still have some issues with 
a very big "book" I am writing but at least on the small example I sent 
it solves the issues.

Thanks a lot,
Xavier