From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: export ICal without evaluate code block
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 22:02:35 +0100
Message-ID: <5314EDEB.4090907@gmx.de>
References: <20140224223948.GA9224@localhost>
	<87y50yrm97.fsf@gmail.com>	<530E47CE.9020209@gmx.de>
	<87txblr2mk.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42625)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1WKa0d-00028X-ML
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 16:02:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1WKa0X-0004Tw-Rr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 16:02:47 -0500
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:55052)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1WKa0X-0004TS-Hf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 16:02:41 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87txblr2mk.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: OSiUX <xuiso@osiux.com.ar>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Greppig org confirms icalendar is likely the only exception. While i 
find this surprising I guess there is a good reason, right?


Cheers,

Simon	

On 02/26/2014 10:21 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de> writes:
>
>> I have some worries here; Why is it so hard to avoid
>> evaluation/modification in org files during export?
>
> I don't think it is. There is a single variable to switch in order to
> control this: `org-export-babel-evaluate'.
>
> Do you think that it doesn't behave as expected?
>
>> I use -batch, I would have tought that was enough, but if I'm getting
>> your answer below right, then setting those 2 parameters is not enough
>> either, because some backends fiddle with them?
>>
>> I have searched the docs but did not find anything about backends
>> overriding these settings.
>
> Besides `icalendar' in a very specific configuration (when exporting
> a calendar, not a single document) I don't think any back-end overwrites
> the previous variable.
>
>
> Regards,
>