From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Girard Subject: Re: Agenda view forgets about including inactive timestamps when refreshed Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:05:24 +0100 Message-ID: <51b0095d0912150305p64d60eb3tbb2225880ce7c5e5@mail.gmail.com> References: <51b0095d0912101426u43cbf372u4bac267099c8f589@mail.gmail.com> <9B7B7710-EC6C-4051-9DA0-EDB2895A65BC@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NKVDa-0003kB-EH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:05:26 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NKVDZ-0003jM-Qe for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:05:26 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54846 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NKVDZ-0003iz-Io for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:05:25 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:46990) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NKVDZ-0002hX-98 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:05:25 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so304582fgg.12 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:05:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9B7B7710-EC6C-4051-9DA0-EDB2895A65BC@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode 2009/12/14 Carsten Dominik : > > On Dec 10, 2009, at 11:26 PM, Nicolas Girard wrote: > >> Hi, >> after the inactive timestamps were included into the agenda view by >> typing '[', they get lost when the view is refreshed by typing 'g'. >> I'm not sure, but it looks like a bug to me. > > Yes, I have not really made this into one of the formal view > modes, because I believe that this view is the exception, and it is > expensive to make. > > I'd think it is not so bad to press `g [' if you need it, right? > Sure, it's harmless ! -- Nicolas