Re: possible org-insert-heading bug?

[Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de>]

Carsten,

any news on this? I'm struggling with RET C-RET during notes taking.

Cheers,

Simon

On 07/03/2013 05:52 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes, org-insert-heading is broken - nad I am trying to find time
> to rewrite it.  My top Org priority.
>
> - Carsten
>
> On 3.7.2013, at 00:11, John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Erik,
>>
>>
>> Glad to see you around :)
>>
>> These all may be quite related. I haven't seen activity on those
>> threads suggesting whether a) the documentation is, in fact, right or
>> wrong or b) whether anyone has taken action to fix or adjust the
>> behavior of M-RET or C-RET based on the complaints/counter-intuitive
>> observations.
>>
>> Let me know if those are similar to your issue. Perhaps Bastien can
>> comment on the state of these thread, now at least four in number...
>>
>> - http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg70718.html
>> - http://osdir.com/ml/emacs-orgmode-gnu/2013-05/msg00846.html
>> - http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/72399
>>
>> I've taken to using C-RET in the meantime, as it seems to do what I
>> often expect when reflexively pressing M-RET. Also, someone once
>> corrected me on the documentation that "at the end of the line" might
>> mean before the ellipsis, not after?
>>
>>
>> Hope that helps!
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Erik Iverson <erikriverson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am using a current git pull (Org-mode version 8.0.3,
>>> release_8.0.3-345-g239aa7) and noticed behavior that's easiest to show
>>> with a small example. If you save and visit the following org file,
>>>
>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7514404/test.org
>>>
>>> you will see the behavior described and documented (assuming it's
>>> reproducible under your version of emacs and orgmode).
>>>
>>> Briefly M-<RET> at the end of a *folded* headline that contains plain
>>> list items will insert a new plain list item at the end of the
>>> subtree, instead of a new top-level headline. I believe this conflicts
>>> with the documentation for M-<RET>, which currently reads:
>>>
>>> ... If the command is used at the end of a folded subtree (i.e.,
>>> behind the ellipses at the end of a headline), then a headline like
>>> the current one will be inserted after the end of the subtree...
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> --Erik
>>>
>>
>
>
>