From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ilya Shlyakhter Subject: Re: are super-hidden technical blocks required? Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:33:47 -0400 Message-ID: <502189BB.4010106@alum.mit.edu> References: <87zk6ea65j.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87r4rppbwc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyrPU-000813-T5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:33:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SyrPU-0001J9-4D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:33:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r4rppbwc.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Achim Gratz , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 8/2/2012 11:10 AM, Bastien wrote: > If the whole point is to make some properties less visible, > why not a solution based on fontification? > > We could have a user-defined regexp to highlight (or "dim") > certain properties. That would still leave the :PROPERTIES: line visible, which is problem for "universal" properties assigned to every entry. > I don't believe in a solution that would change the current > flow of cycling through drawers. I feel that's too much. I agree. Showing hidden drawers is a rarely-used operation and should be a separate command, not part of the commonly-used cycling.