From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Darlan Cavalcante Moreira <darcamo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:39:33 -0300
Message-ID: <4ea578aa.0d06650a.371d.ffff9cec@mx.google.com>
References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <87aa8u5mu7.fsf@gmail.com>
	<871uu65j7i.fsf@gmail.com> <201110231442.17386.DanielBausch@gmx.de>
	<87sjmiq1qu.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35240)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <darcamo@gmail.com>) id 1RILgp-0000b2-4d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:39:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <darcamo@gmail.com>) id 1RILgn-0001pR-7W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:39:47 -0400
Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:63660)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <darcamo@gmail.com>) id 1RILgm-0001ot-Rv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:39:45 -0400
Received: by yxp4 with SMTP id 4so2801383yxp.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87sjmiq1qu.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Daniel Bausch <DanielBausch@gmx.de>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Does org have TAB completion in "call lines" for names of blocks that can
be called?  Using "srcname" for blocks of code could make things easier but
if this is not the case then I "name" is just fine.

--
Darlan

At Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:37:13 +0100,
Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Daniel Bausch <DanielBausch@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> >>          named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function"
> >> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob"
> >>                 named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data"
> >
> > what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ?
> >
> > That a table or list contains data is obvious.  The only thing, the additional 
> > line is for, is to "name" it.  That a source block contains source is also 
> > obvious and is already noted by the use of #+begin_src, so why duplicate the 
> > "src"-part?
> >
> > Daniel
> 
> I don't know if I've left it too late to vote on this but...
> 
> I would go for "name" for [1] and [3] and "call" for [2].
> 
> I can, however, see the need for distinguishing between data tables and
> results so could be convinced that "data" and "results" should be used
> for [3].  In any case, I do know that I dislike srcname and tblname...
> 
> -- 
> : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.90.1
> : using Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.452.g767f5)
>