From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: Duration Tally
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:10:52 +0200
Message-ID: <4ba7b43599b19bba14eda728f080584f@science.uva.nl>
References: <20070613134706.GA10452@odin.demosthenes.org>
	<5d0f364daf5b03d86df0137293c136e7@science.uva.nl>
	<20070619112121.GA22618@odin.demosthenes.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I0dU2-0003rN-J6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:10:58 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I0dU0-0003qw-9J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:10:57 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0dTz-0003qt-V9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:10:55 -0400
Received: from korteweg.uva.nl ([146.50.98.70])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dominik@science.uva.nl>) id 1I0dTz-0005Pi-Jz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:10:55 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20070619112121.GA22618@odin.demosthenes.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Russell Adams <RLAdams@AdamsInfoServ.Com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Jun 19, 2007, at 13:21, Russell Adams wrote:

>>> It could be nice later to schedule A, and then have each
>>> of a1-3 show up on the agenda based on their duration.
>>
>> I am not sure if I understand what you mean here.
>>
>> - Carsten
>
> I mean that the parent would be scheduled at a fixed date/time, and
> then child entries would be in the agenda based on their relative
> duration. That way you don't assign a fixed date/time to every entry,
> just the first, and then manage by duration from there.

You mean if I schedule the project on the 15th, and the first subtask
takes 8 hours, the second subtask should then be scheduled on the 16th?

- Carsten